The bad idea herein is the assertion that digital communication, especially texting on social media, damages students’ grammar skills. The author claims it is a bad idea because it simply mirrors the history of lamenting about the diminishing language skills of the younger generations. Moreover, the author argues that the assertion is founded on unproven association between digital writing and other forms of writing. In other words, no empirical study has been conducted to establish a causal relationship between digital writing and other forms of writing. Additionally, the author opines that the definition of grammar in the context of digital writing is always untrue.
I chose the piece because of the need to put to rest the debate about the impact of digital writing on students’ writing skills. Social media communication has become the norm, particularly among the younger generations. There are no rules on social media communications. As a result, many young people mutilate grammar in their attempts to simplify communication. Although the author terms the assertion that texting ruins students’ skills a bad idea, it is important to note that over time, the unregulated and grammatically incorrect social media communication can compromise the students’ language proficiencies.
To counter this bad idea, a good idea would be to conduct a robust empirical study to establish the link between digital communication and other forms of writing. Essentially, the debate will be put to rest once there is unimpeachable evidence on the adverse effect of texting on students’ grammar skills. Proving that social media communication ruins students’ language proficiencies would inform the implementation of measures to regulate social media participation among students. In summary, texting ruins students’ grammar skills.

