Week 2: Reading & Writing Essentials

After I have finished reading “Reading Games: Strategies for Reading Scholarly Sources” by Karen Rosenberg and “How to Read Like a Writer” by Mike Bunn. I felt this two reading is grabbing my attention that makes me wants to continue reading it because these two reading they all start with interesting personal information that they have been experienced. Based on their beginning of their writing it makes me reminds of myself personal things or something that I have experience when it is first time. I think for me to do better while I’m reading is to underline for keyword or interesting fact that I like about it. Circle vocabulary that I don’t understand and translate to the language that I understand and find the definition so when I go back to the reading it could help me to understand better and know what the author is talking about intheir reading. Three takeaways or tips that I would say is to ask question while you were reading, what is some advantages and disadvantage about the reading and how did the author wrote this reading how can it shows the reader the value of reading this story or passage.

In Rosenberg’s writing I like page 215 it says “Usually one paragraph at the beginning of an article, the abstract serves to encapsulate the main points of the article. It’s generally a pretty specialized summary that seeks to answer specific questions. These include: the main problem or question, the approach (how did the author(s) do the work they write about in the article?), the shiny new thing that this article does (more on this later, but to be published in an academic journal you often need to argue that you are doing something that has not been done before), and why people who are already invested in this field should care (in other words, you should be able to figure out why another academic should find the article important).” I totally agree with Rosenberg because not even just one paragraph can tell you lots of idea and important things throughout the few sentences. Although, Rosenberg use conversation in his reading mean to me you can see different opinion based on two conversation, this would make the reader or the audience to see to agree either one idea by their conversation throughout the reading. However, in the other reading “How to Read Like a Writer” by Mike Bunn. In his writing he uses bullet points to give some tips for better writing while you were a writer. Such as in page 81 he said “• How does the author move from one idea to another in the writing? Are the transitions between the ideas effective? How else might he/she have transitioned between ideas instead?” I think this really helps to improve your writing better because for me English is not my native language and I think it is not easy to move from one idea to another idea.

Week 2: Reading and Writing Essentials ( Yeshi Wangchuk)

  1. After reading Mike Bunn’s “How to Read Like a Writer” and Karen Rosenberg’s “Reading Games: Strategies for Reading Scholarly Sources” I found that each of them began with a Personal Story that was really fascinating to me and captivated me to read more, it seemed like I was talking to a friend rather than a complete stranger. The writers offer tips and tricks on how to read as a writer in each of the articles and there were 3 out of all those tips that I think would help improve my own practices as we go forward with the course. The first tip that caught my eye was “One thing that I like to do is to highlight and
    underline the passage in the text itself, and then try to answer the following three questions on my notepad:
    • What is the technique the author is using here?
    • Is this technique effective?
    • What would be the advantages and disadvantages if I tried this
    same technique in my writing?”(Mike Bunn “How to Read Like a Writer Pg:81).This caught my eye because if i want to understand a text i need to question myself all these questions and try to answer it so if i ever get lost or confused i can always go back to my notes and revise. The second tip that caught my eye was “If you remain confused, continue to ask for clarification. Ask questions in class (your classmates will be grateful). Go to office hours. Most faculty love the opportunity to talk about readings that they have chosen with care”( Karen Rosenberg “Reading Games: Strategies for Reading Scholarly Pg: 215). As i read this tip i found it very useful and informative most people just read what their professors assign and just think about when its due but we forget to think about the why, why was  it was assigned specifically why do we have to read it and we also forget to ask the teachers questions about our hidden concerns. As Rosenberg talked about this i loved the phrase he used ” Get a lay of the land before you go too deep” this made so much sense to me because i am that student who dives in to work without having a plan or what to do next. The third and final Tip that caught my eye was “In the first reading of an article, it’s smart to hold off on looking too many things up. Just be prepared to face a wall of references that don’t mean a whole lot to you'(Karen Rosenberg “Reading Games: Strategies for Reading Scholarly Pg:214). This is true for so many students like me when i used to read scholarly articles the author had used many phrases which made no sense i had to search up many phrases just to try and understand a little but in fact sometimes those phrases are not important at all and we can still learn the lesson the author is trying to explain.

 

2) Rosenberg writes in several places about reading academic text as entering a conversation what this means to me is that as we read academic text we think about why the author does this, why did he use this specific example how did it impact the story, why did the author use a specific setting etc. As we read and asks ourself these questions its almost as if we are entering a conversation with the texts. We can have conversations with a text by asking rhetorical questions as to why something happens, how did it happen, when did it happen, why the author used this specific detail etc.

3) According to Bunn, Before you read a text is question your self why the author is writing this text whats the purpose, who is the audience for the article is, and what type of genre it is.

BONUS) I find Bunn’s and Rosenbergs articles very fascinating even though both articles seemed informal i felt that Rosenbergs article was a little more formal than Bunn’s. In Bunn’s article he started of formal but then switched midway to an informal style which i really like it felt more like i was talking with a friend and understood more. Even though Rosenbergs article was a little informal it didnt feel like i was conversing with a friend like Bunns did .