Week 2: Reading & Writing Essentials

Some unique takeaways I gathered from reading the “Reading Games: Strategies for Reading Scholarly Sources,” by Karen Rosenberg and “How to Read Like a Writer,” by Mike Bunn is to question every word and sentence the author chooses. I tend to read through articles to get it over with but to improve as a writer I need to change that. Another tip I acquired from Rosenberg was to build a solid introduction. The introduction is the foundation of the writing piece and without it the reader would confused on what the main idea would be. In many of my essays, the introductions tend to be rushed and the body is what I focus on. Rosenberg has also taught me to focus on what important information I should reveal to my audience, by keeping that in mind I can filter the kind of information I allow into my writing. Reading like a writer will help you improve your skills as a writer.

Rosenberg writes in several places about reading academic texts as entering a conversation. The author means that you need to be engaged with text inorder to fully understand it. In a conversation, you cannot fully comprehend if you don’t to listen to the person. You can have a conversation with the text by trying to find the meaning of each word, sentence, and paragraph. To speak to the text one must understand the reasoning behind everything. Some of the different ways you can learn about the meaning of a text is by looking at who the intended audience is and the intent of the author.

Mike Bunn’s voice in the reading was formal while Karen Rosenberg was informal. Rosenberg’s informal is simplified in a way everyone can fully understand. Although Bunn’s text was formal it wasn’t as interesting as Rosenberg’s.

 

 

Identity & Writing

After listening to Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s “The Danger of a Single Story” Ted Talk, I realize how easily and ignorantly we generalize groups of people just by knowing one side of the story or, in other words, a single story. Based on my understanding of Adichie’s speech, a single story is a one-sided ignorant view of an individual or ethnic group. In other words, it is the generalization of an individual just by associating a dreadful comment of someone to everyone just like Adichie says in the following quote “show a people as one thing, as only one thing. Over and over again”. A good example of this is the following statement: nowadays we see on the internet many people from East Asia eating animals alive such as newborn rodents, which is cruel, and many of us generalize this concept with all of the people from this region. This is very ignorant because not all of them do this. Another example is people thinking that everyone from the Dominican Republic (my country) are colored skin. Not everyone in the Dominican Republic is colored skin and it makes me feel sad when people don’t believe me that I am Dominican because they say “You are too white”. I love my country and I am very proud of it and it hurts me to see this type of comment. Growing up I used to read many stories of aerospace, astronauts, and in school many fictional stories, which I was forced to read but they had amazing messages and lessons. One of the books that portrayed, unconsciously, a single story like Adichie stated. This happened 10 years ago and the book was The Circuit: Stories from the Life of a Migrant Child (Cajas de cartón) by Francisco Jimenez. This book is an autobiographical novel based on the journey from Mexico to the United States of America by Francisco Jimenez (The author) when he was a child. The author shows how he lived in big poverty and states that he and his family used to sleep on cardboard boxes when they arrived to the USA. They had a very difficult life. This made me feel big sorrow and pity for him and all the immigrant families that come from Mexico to the USA. Unconsciously this created a very ignorant single story in my mind that all Mexican immigrant families were very poor people. After a few years, I learned the hard way that fortunately, not all Mexican immigrants had such bad luck and that not all of them are poor. I think modern technology does contribute to creating all of these single stories. For example, I was once watching a documentary on African tribes with a friend of mine and we were seeing how primitive these tribes lived. My friend commented that all African people behave this way and were very primitive and “primal”. I corrected him and said that many African countries are actually very advance with high human development. However, people that watched such documentaries and don’t have a big understanding of them will conclude that Africans are primitive people that live wildly.