Dr. Google’s Scheme to make us stupid

It is known that societies reliance on Dr. Google and the touch of a button has encouraged us to skim through text instead of carefully reading and analyzing the text without thinking for yourself. This speaks to what Carr states “that having access to infinite knowledge is making us stupid. We are not thinking for ourselves and relying on a machine.  We are not reading rather skimming through article, and books to get to the point of the story. The article specifies about Carrs experience of having focusing issues. Carr believes that it is taking him longer to read because he can’t stay focus.  He has an issue with the fact that we read more but not longer so focusing has become a major problem because of technology and Dr. Google.

Having immediate access to a search engine we loose our sense of thinking and reading process. The reader is not thinking the way they use to think. He states that while reading he no longer gets caught up in the narrative instead his concentration starts to drift after two or three pages. One looses focus and the way society once read a book, novel, article which used to come easy is now a constant struggle to stay focused. Although, Dr. Google has saved the life of our long day because we no longer have to go to a public library and sit there for hours it still making us stupid. Some of the pros is that we save time and it makes life easier to work from home.

It is known that Dr. Google knows it and as soon as you debate someone on a topic they immediately turn to Google to prove their point. However I believe that many people totally rely on a search button or link to gather information without the thought process. Carr argues that “speech is an innate ability that stems from the brain structure, reading is conscious and taught.” This is true because when we are reading we have to read for understanding and the use of google is just feeding us information while also monitoring the information they rendering to us. This s not that difficult to understand because they just want to keep us stupid and affecting how we think. Our brains need to be nurtured and not fed information. We need to learn to think and analyze for ourselves how and what we are reading. I for one rely on google for everything but recently have been reading more because I find that many people I know have even gone to the extent to self diagnose themselves instead of going to a doctors office.

While having access to the internet  as a secondary source is great, one should never rely on it as a primary source.  Many people (including myself) have become so dependent of the resources on the internet we are not realizing that the internet is actually making us stupid and slowing our brains. For example, Carr explains that Bruce Friedman who blogs regularly about computers and medicine says that google has “altered his mental habits,” and explains by saying “I now have almost totally lost the ability to read and absorb a longish article on the web or in print.” He blames the internet for his inability to read for a long period of time. I find that to be dangerous to our minds because we are no longer thinking for ourselves or reading for understanding. We must also understand that this is exactly what the media, technology, and the internet wants to do to us. How the internet monitors the information they render to us is harmful to our brains and keeping us stupid is googles every intentions.

To conclude, I want to say that google is a good form of resource and information, but we can not rely on google as a primary source. We must also nourish our brain by training it to think and staying focus for a longer period of time.

It is known that societies reliance on Dr. Google and the touch of a button has encouraged us to skim through text instead of carefully reading and analyzing the text without thinking for yourself. This speaks to what Carr states “that having access to infinite knowledge is making us stupid. We are not thinking for ourselves and relying on a machine.  We are not reading rather skimming through article, and books to get to the point of the story. The article specifies about Carrs experience of having focusing issues. Carr believes that it is taking him longer to read because he can’t stay focus.  He has an issue with the fact that we read more but not longer so focusing has become a major problem because of technology and Dr. Google.

Having immediate access to a search engine we loose our sense of thinking and reading process. The reader is not thinking the way they use to think. He states that while reading he no longer gets caught up in the narrative instead his concentration starts to drift after two or three pages. One looses focus and the way society once read a book, novel, article which used to come easy is now a constant struggle to stay focused. Although, Dr. Google has saved the life of our long day because we no longer have to go to a public library and sit there for hours it still making us stupid. Some of the pros is that we save time and it makes life easier to work from home.

It is known that Dr. Google knows it and as soon as you debate someone on a topic they immediately turn to Google to prove their point. However I believe that many people totally rely on a search button or link to gather information without the thought process. Carr argues that “speech is an innate ability that stems from the brain structure, reading is conscious and taught.” This is true because when we are reading we have to read for understanding and the use of google is just feeding us information while also monitoring the information they rendering to us. This s not that difficult to understand because they just want to keep us stupid and affecting how we think. Our brains need to be nurtured and not fed information. We need to learn to think and analyze for ourselves how and what we are reading. I for one rely on google for everything but recently have been reading more because I find that many people I know have even gone to the extent to self diagnose themselves instead of going to a doctors office.

While having access to the internet  as a secondary source is great, one should never rely on it as a primary source.  Many people (including myself) have become so dependent of the resources on the internet we are not realizing that the internet is actually making us stupid and slowing our brains. For example, Carr explains that Bruce Friedman who blogs regularly about computers and medicine says that google has “altered his mental habits,” and explains by saying “I now have almost totally lost the ability to read and absorb a longish article on the web or in print.” He blames the internet for his inability to read for a long period of time. I find that to be dangerous to our minds because we are no longer thinking for ourselves or reading for understanding. We must also understand that this is exactly what the media, technology, and the internet wants to do to us. How the internet monitors the information they render to us is harmful to our brains and keeping us stupid is googles every intentions.

To conclude, I want to say that google is a good form of resource and information, but we can not rely on google as a primary source. We must also nourish our brain by training it to think and staying focus for a longer period of time.

Ask Dr. Google

 

It is known that societies reliance on Dr. Google and the touch of a button has encouraged us to skim through text instead of carefully reading and analyzing the text without thinking for yourself. This speaks to what Carr states “that having access to infinite knowledge is making us stupid. We are not thinking for ourselves and relying on a machine.  We are not reading rather skimming through article, and books to get to the point of the story. The article specifies about Carrs experience of having focusing issues. Carr believes that it is taking him longer to read because he can’t stay focus.  He has an issue with the fact that we read more but not longer so focusing has become a major problem because of technology and Dr. Google.

Having immediate access to a search engine we loose our sense of thinking and reading process. The reader is not thinking the way they use to think. He states that while reading he no longer gets caught up in the narrative instead his concentration starts to drift after two or three pages. One looses focus and the way society once read a book, novel, article which used to come easy is now a constant struggle to stay focused. Although, Dr. Google has saved the life of our long day because we no longer have to go to a public library and sit there for hours, it is still making us stupid. Some of the pros is the click of a button and you get a wealth of information in a short period of time. With all this information we as a society are becoming stupid because although we are reading more we are not analyzing and thinking for ourselves.

The author believes that although we are getting information is good but it is harming our brains because we are not reading for understanding anymore instead we are reading to get information. He argues that “reading is conscious and taught” which is the reason why many believe that Dr. Google is stupid and is making people stupid as well. It wants us to maintain stupid without a level of conscious and thinking process and affecting human intelligence.This is dangerous because the internet is monitoring and watching how much information is being shared. An analysis that I would like to make is that the internet is affecting our brains in a negative way. Many people I know are self diagnosing themselves based on the information being rendered. I know teens believing that they have bi polar disorders because of the information they read on the internet. That is the reason why I call it Dr. Google because people rely completely on Google. As for me I am one of those teens but lately I have been trying to stay of the internet and watching what I allow my to process because thinking analytically is important and we nourish our brain with knowledge.

To conclude, I want to say that societies total reliance on Dr. Google is dangerous for us as a whole.  Google  just wants to keep us stupid by monitoring the level of information we receive. I agree that while it is helpful and saves time; it can also be harmful to our brains.

Knowledge at our fingertips

I agree with Carr having advanced technology in our daily lives is affecting the way we learn and read. When Carr states that having access to infinite knowledge is making us stupid i think that Carrs is not necessarily calling us stupid what he is implying is that because we have easy ways to access informations and answers we are relying more on technology to do the work for us and not giving time to do it ourselves. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” Carr’s states “For me, as for others, the Net is becoming a universal medium, the conduit for most of the information that flows through my eyes and ears and into my mind. The advantages of having immediate access to such an incredibly rich store of information are many, and they’ve been widely described and duly applauded.” this example shows that having advanced technologies makes it easier to find informations or answers that we need This is making us lazy and not really understand the problems that were given to us having this information makes us seem smart by answering it correctly but in reality we are just trying to get it over with and not really understand whats going on.

I don’t think there are problems with having immediate access to informations and answers. But because we have easy access we are loosing the will to do problems ourself, the ability to think outside the box, etc having immediate access is convenient but in return it makes us more lazy or have the curiosity about anything. I am also a part of this having easy access makes me lazy for example i use many softwares google has like grammarly which corrects my work as i type making me less interested to learn new vocabularies because grammarly already does it for me. I also have another software called speechify which reads the documents to me because of how lazy i have become.

The pros of this is that having immediate access helps us look for informations faster, research problems for school, research places to go to eat or go out, help us find about specific medicines etc. this makes our lives easier because all our answers is online and all we have to do is search it making it easy and fast. But because of this the cons are we tend to get more lazy and rely more on technology for example i rely on google for informations about questions from school, or use softwares google has to help me read and write this shows that because of technology we all have changed and we all rely on technology wether we want to or not.

I think both. Internet is giving us easier access to news or information about whats happening all over the world and because of this its helping us realize whats going on, are there any new discoveries being made, are there any new experiments, etc but its also melting our brains away because we are relying on technology too much i used to read and write and learn new things from the mistakes i made but now everything is online if i want to sound smart and look for new words i can search that up, if i want to write essays there are softwares that can help, if i feel lazy to read there are softwares that reads for you and i also currently use that software

Week 12: Knowledge at Our Fingertips (Vicky Chen)

  1. In Nicholas Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, he says having access to infinite knowledge is making us stupid. I believe Carr is implying that our easy access to the internet has lead us to rely on it for enlightenment. Instead of having to read through books for knowledge, it is now as easy as using the google search bar or even asking Siri/Alexa. Carr feels that over the past few years his brain has been “remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory.” He feels that reading a lengthy article is not as easy as it used to be. The easy access to “infinite knowledge” is making us stupid.
  2. I believe that immediate access to knowledge can bring problems but it can definitely be very beneficial to us. I have never had to go to the library and find a physical book to conduct research. I have always turned to the internet for information. Problems that could arise would be that people stop absorbing knowledge and people’s memory start to weaken.
  3. I agree with Clay Shirkey when he argues that constantly having access to the internet, we are able to experiment with new areas of knowledge in a much easier/accessible way. One of the pros to having easy access to the internet is that we save a lot of time when it comes to researching or learning about something new. Instead of having to read books, look through textbooks and newspapers, we can use the internet for information. A con to having this easy access could be that people start over relying on the technology
  4. I think that the internet is giving us new knowledge more than melting our brains away. The internet has allowed many people to educate themselves from home and to do quick research. Many has learned self taught themselves new hobbies or new cooking recipes. The internet has also allowed us to learn from our homes during this pandemic. Without the internet we wouldn’t have had this opportunity to continue our studies during a time like this. Despite believing that the internet is giving us new knowledge, I can see how it can also be “melting our brains away.” Our brains are slowly becoming reliant on the easy access we have to the internet. This may lead some to have shorter attention spans or even possibly becoming more lazy. With the right amount of self discipline, we can control and limit the amount of technology usage. This can help keep us from becoming fully reliant on technology. Less problems may occur if we balance the usage of relying on the internet for new knowledge and using the traditional way of read and looking through books to soaking up new knowledge.